Posts Tagged ‘biology’

h1

Natural Selection and Evolution – A Stunning Concept Part 1

24/11/2009

Today is the 150th anniversary of the publishing of The Origin of Species or its full title: On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. This earth shaking work, by Charles Darwin, introduced the world to the concept of natural selection as a driving force of evolutionary change. I have been wanting to write about the basics (and I do mean basics) of evolution for a while, so I thought that I would start today.

Why am I doing this? I love biology, and the theory of evolution by natural selection is one of the most elegant (in my opinion) and simple theories in science. I want to share my understanding of this fascinating subject that underpins modern biology. And I love to teach, to tell, to share the wonder I have about the natural world with as many people as possible.

I find that many of the people that denounce the theory of evolution have little understanding of it, nor science in general. I intend to explain things in my own time. I might miss something, or gloss over it. Please, dear reader, ask questions. I crave dialogue and discussion, and although we may not agree, I will listen to you, if you grant me the same courtesy. I will not formerly list sources, as a lot of this material has built up over time from various books, lectures etc. If you would like some reading suggestion, again please ask!

To some, the theory of evolution is wrong simply because organisms *look* designed. They seem to do what they do so well that how could they be anything but designed? It also does not help that we live in a world filled with things that we humans have designed and function well in the role they were designed to fulfill. In a way, you could look at natural organisms and say that they were designed: designed by the slow, incremental process of natural selection. This is not my idea, but it is an interesting way to look at natural selection. Note that there is no mention of an external designer. In the case of natural selection the “designer” is simply the environment (including non living and living factors) that the organism must survive in…

I am getting ahead of myself, so I will pause for a moment to discuss to terms that will appear every now and then. The terms are ‘evolution’ and ‘natural selection’. Evolution simply means change. We use this term all of the time, in a variety of contexts. For example, we might say that a band’s music has evolved to be more mature over the last decade. You might remark that your attitude toward child poverty has evolved after you visited an orphanage in the Honduras. Evolution in biology has the same meaning! Evolution is just the change of organisms over time (time in this case is an extremely important idea, and I will return to it later…). These changes build up until new species are formed and the tree of life branches. Natural selection is the idea of natural processes (environment, predators, diseases, population pressures, parasites, etc) ’selecting’ for useful traits. Darwin, in Origin, used the analogy of artificial selection to help explain it. Most farmers, animal breeders, orchid growers out there know that if there is a trait that you desire in an organism, you look for organisms that posses that trait and then breed them, hoping the offspring will also have that trait. In natural selection, an organism might have some small mutation(more on this term later as well) that helps the organism survive just a little better than its neighbors. It is able to reproduce and pass on that mutation to its offspring. Over time, all of the organisms of that species has that trait. For example: all humans are bipedal, but most chimpanzees are not. At some time in our history, some distant ancestor started walking on two legs. It proved a useful strategy for something, and now we walk upright. So natural selection is simply the environment selecting traits. Blindly selecting traits, I will add. There is no farmer choosing the traits… Hence the ‘natural’ designation.

I think that is enough for one day. Next time I will talk more about the changes or mutations that cause the different traits for nature to select…

Scott

h1

Taxonomy of Calculusaurus

02/12/2008

Well friends, I am almost finished. What started as a battle with a fearsome beast, the Calculusaurus, has evolved into an alliance, perhaps even a friendship. Yes, I have learned that the Calculusaurus is not defeated by force of arms or direct confrontation. One must treat the Calculusaurus gently, with companionship, yet still be wary. Little by little, with practice, the Calculusaurus is brought to one’s side where it becomes an ally… for I have learned something else:

There are more than one calculusaurid! There are more than one species in the genus Calculusaurus. In order to enlighten you, my loyal readers, I will describe the taxonomic organization of said creature:

Genus: Calculusaurus
Species:
1)C. derivativius: known for its smaller stature among calculusaurids, it feeds mostly on first year students. Its physiology consists of limits and derivatives and algebraic excess
2)C. integralusnewtonii: Larger than C. derivativius it is also far more dangerous and aggressive. It has been known to sum infinite series while calculating the area under curves. Unable to be approached unless one has tamed a C. derivativius.
3)C. multivariabilius, C. vectoronoma, and C. tensoraeaii: Little is know of these fearsome beasts that lurk in the shadows of math departments everywhere. To first-years they are but a rumour, a shadow on the edge of the mind. To more experienced mathmagicians, they are mighty beasts, tamed only by those that posses the most potent of mathmagic and spellquations. If I ever learn more of these three, I will tell you…

So but one final task, and I will perhaps have tamed my own C. derivativius and then one day I will be able to hunt a fearsome C. integralusnewtonii.

Do not drink and derive…

S.